6ft high trellis planter H Potter Garden Obelisk Trellis for Climbing Plants 6 Foot Metal Landscape Structure GAR677
SKU: 78347487843
6ft high trellis planter

6ft high trellis planter H Potter Garden Obelisk Trellis for Climbing Plants 6 Foot Metal Landscape Structure GAR677

$19.83 $22.03
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on piotrzbierski.com >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

6ft high trellis planter H Potter Garden Obelisk Trellis for Climbing Plants 6 Foot Metal Landscape Structure GAR677LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE GARDEN OBELISK FROM H POTTER H Potter's iron trellises are not only a decorative piece to add dimension and depth to your garden, they are completely functional. While the obelisk trellis adds a stylish element of grace to your backyard, deck or patio, its value also rests on its architectural garden grace among your outdoor decor. Adding a garden obelisk or trellis to your backyard is a fantastic way to draw attention to your

  • LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE GARDEN OBELISK FROM H POTTER

    H Potter's iron trellises are not only a decorative piece to add dimension and depth to your garden, they are completely functional. While the obelisk trellis adds a stylish element of grace to your backyard, deck or patio, its value also rests on its architectural garden grace among your outdoor decor. 

    Adding a garden obelisk or trellis to your backyard is a fantastic way to draw attention to your outdoor area. H Potter's obelisks are a sturdy element in the garden that is also visually captivating for guests, family, friends or passers-by. Curious about the history of obelisks, check out this blog post for more information.

  • BENEFIT OF H POTTER’S METAL GARDEN OBELISK

    A climbing plant support obelisk is a great way to infuse a refined sense of elegance into your exterior spaces around the backyard and garden. These large vertical trellises stand on their own and benefit from being adorned with climbing vines or flowers. These 6 foot tall iron garden ornaments are a perfect addition in pots or in your garden.

  • DIMENSIONS OF THE H POTTER TRELLIS OBELISK

    • Height: 72 inches
    • Area of Base:
      • Inner dimensions: 11.5 inches
    • Weight: 22 pounds
    • Ground Spikes 4 of the 9 inch long stakes

  • WHAT CAN I DO WITH A IRON OBELISK FROM H POTTER?

    Landscape structures like iron garden obelisk trellises from H Potter can be used to frame your garden on their own, or they can be purchased in pairs to create an entrance to your garden or simply increase the grandeur of this outdoor gardening space. H Potter's obelisks are highly durable and are capable of weathering the elements, maintaining their stately look over time. 

  • USE YOUR OBELISK TO CREATE VERTICAL YARD ART WITH YOUR FAVORITE CLIMBING ROSES

    A garden obelisk is the best way to add height, depth and a sturdy structure to your outdoor decor. These iron garden monuments will allow the homeowner or gardener to grow plants and flowers skyward, creating unparalleled vertical garden decor for the outdoors.

    Maximize your garden space with the functional capability of an H Potter Obelisk. Capture the visual center of your garden or other outdoor space such as a patio, deck, courtyard, or terrace. For more vertical-garden inspiration, explore how tall planters serve as striking architectural accents, pairing beautifully with trellises and climbing structures like this one.

  • PERSONALIZE YOUR OUTDOOR SPACE WITH MULTIPLE OBELISKS

    H Potter Obelisks are sold as a single unit. However, these trellises are often purchased in multiples to serve as larger yard art or to frame the beauty of the garden or a garden entrance. The clean lines of the iron obelisk effortlessly integrate into any garden setting or design, providing a perfect canvas for climbing plants to elegantly ascend. To learn more about garden obelisks see our blog.

    Our garden obelisk is durable and sturdy. Furthermore, they can be used to create arches or dividers in the garden so that it looks beautiful while still being organized and functional. Iron is both lightweight and easy to work with so it’s perfect for creating custom designs in your backyard, no matter how much space you have!  Transform even the smallest garden areas with our small-space garden transformation ideas, featuring trellises that contribute structure and dimension.

  • FEATURES OF AN OBELISK GARDEN TRELLIS FROM H POTTER

    • Essential Landscape Element

This wonderful piece of garden architecture feature will stand the test of time by offering a solid and secure structure for your plants and garden space. H Potter's garden obelisk comes with a secure ground anchoring system (plus 4 of the 9 inch ground spikes) to support the weight of the obelisk and any plant material.

Some assembly is required. Additionally, we recommend two people for assembly due to height of the structure.

                • Powder-Coated Finish

Handcrafted iron work topped with a stately finial. The tower has a charcoal brown powder coating, then a hand-rubbed faux finish gives the iron obelisk its rustic, durable appeal. You can set it as its own display, add climbing plants like roses, vines, and clematis, or even install additional obelisks to facilitate privacy.

                  • Quality Packaging and Service are the H Potter Promise

For over a quarter century, we’ve been designing and manufacturing indoor and outdoor décor products for your home and garden. With over 150 designs, including terrariums, lanterns, trellises, window boxes, planters, wreaths and arbors, you’re certain to find the service you’re looking for at H Potter.

            • ENTICE THE EYE WITH AN H POTTER OBELISK FOR CLIMBING PLANTS

              H Potter is a family-owned business and we take extreme pride in creating distinctive home and garden accents. Many of our signature items are 100% handmade by our artisans to ensure a top-notch product.

              We put significant resources into the design, quality, function, and look of each H Potter item. using only quality materials including stainless steel, hand-blown glass, and dramatic copper. We believe our customers deserve only the best, so we don’t cut corners to save money.
              If you want to discuss more ideas for boosting your home and garden aesthetics with a garden obelisk from H Potter, then reach out to our team today.

Materials & Care 

H Potter metal trellises are created using heavy duty iron for ultimate durability. The trellises are powder-coated a charcoal brown, followed with a hand-applied faux black and finished with a high grade clear-coat protective sealer. This smooth finish can be spray painted once you receive your trellis if you prefer a different color.

To add a bit of extra protection to the finish, you might choose to apply a coat or two of clear spray paint annually to the trellis which can be purchased at a hardware type store. Sometimes during transit or while the trellis is in the ground, small hairline cracks can occur in the finish due to the metal flexing. If you notice this has occurred, please spray the area with the same clear spray paint. Please use care during assembly. If you happen to mar the finish during assembly, you should repair the area with the same clear spray paint.

H Potter trellises are all packaged with ground spikes.

Metal trellises add a touch of simple elegance to a space. Beautiful on their own and even more beautiful adorned with growing vines, a trellis makes the perfect addition to a home or garden. Our H Potter Iron Garden Obelisk Trellis can be used as a standalone trellis or purchased in pairs to frame your yard space or garden entrance. Sturdy and able to withstand outdoor conditions, these trellises will stand the test of time and look beautiful while doing it.

 

Measurements other images
  • The trellis dimensions 72" high by 12 inches square.

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 78347487843

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 6ft high trellis planter

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 590 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S.B.
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Great, easy to understand explanations
Format: Kindle
I definitely needed this! I have been enduring a long period of spiritual attacks in the natural and physical realms. It has helped me to better understand my calling, even though I have been serving God as a spirit filled and spirit baptized follower of Yeshua.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Trader Dave
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy to read. Line spacing is just right! Thank you!
Format: Paperback
Michael Van Vlymen delivers the lived from experience truth once again! Michael is down to earth and matter of fact as he writes. He is heavenly minded every day! I've grown more in love with Jesus because of his testimony of heavenly realms operating on the earthly realm. My eyes have been opened much much more as I listen and read Mikes well illustrated books and videos!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2025
O
Verified Purchase
Online shopper
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Challenge Accepted
Format: Kindle
I liked the book. It challenged my position of focusing on the light and ignoring the darkness. It challenges me to desire the whole experience of spiritual awareness and sight and to become adept in living as a watchman.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Tim Chaffey
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Outstanding, compelling, and thorough work on the historicity or non-historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus
Format: Paperback
I had been looking forward to reading this book since the first time I heard about it. I was sitting in Dr. Gary Habermas' class on miracles and he told us about Mike Licona, who was currently working on his dissertation on the Resurrection. Although it was published in 2010, I finally had the opportunity to read it over the past few months. At over 700 pages, including an extensive bibliography and over 2,000 footnotes, this book is not a light read by any stretch of the imagination. As the subtitle states, this is a book dealing with historiography. Readers looking for a deep theological treatment on the Resurrection of Christ may want to look elsewhere since Licona's focus here is not theology, but history (although there is still a good deal of theology). Using methodological principles agreed upon by a vast number of historians from a variety of religious and philosophical backgrounds, he sets out to determine whether or not the historian "is warranted in regarding Jesus' resurrection as an event that occurred in the past" (p. 610). Surprisingly, the book consists of only five chapters and one appendix, so each chapter averages more than 100 pages in length. Also, the second half of the book contains a significant amount of Greek, giving me a good opportunity to brush up on that. If you can't read Greek, don't worry, Dr. Licona provides an English translation throughout. The first section deals with a significant number of preliminary considerations. There is an excellent critique of the skeptical postmodern view of history and a complete dismantling of the beliefs of Jesus "mythers" (those who claim Jesus never existed). There's also a good discussion on horizons (the presuppositions and biases we all have). While total neutrality may not be possible, Licona gives several principles historians should implement to help them transcend their horizon. Finally, he provides an honest discussion of his own biases so that readers are well aware of where he is coming from. The second chapter focuses on whether or not miracles fall within the purview of the historian. Licona addresses the popular objections of David Hume and Bart Ehrman, as well as McCullagh, Meier, Wedderburn, and Dunn. Many skeptics simply have an a priori objection to miracles, so they aren't willing to even consider the possibility that historical evidence for a miracle may exist. There's an interesting discussion on the burden of proof as it relates to the historicity of miracle claims. I thought the following quote summarized the nature of evidence when it comes to miracle claims: "It is the responsibility of the historian to consider what the evidence would look like if she were not wearing her metaphysical bias like a pair of sunglasses that shade the world. It is not the responsibility of the evidence to shine so brightly that they render such glasses ineffectual." (p. 196) With all the preliminary matters out of the way, Dr. Licona gets down to the business of doing history. Chapter three examines the historical sources pertaining to Christ's Resurrection. Many Christians may object to the methodology employed in this chapter since he does not automatically accept every biblical passage on the subject as evidence, but bear in mind that Licona is doing his best to transcend his own Christian horizon to be as neutral as possible. He discusses over two dozen early sources and rates them as "unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probable, indeterminate [or] not useful" (p. 201). The fourth chapter uncovers the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This approach follows on the heels of the exhaustive work of Dr. Habermas who, since 1975, has kept track of over 3,400 academic works from scholars of various stripes on the Resurrection in English, German, and French. From this research, Dr. Habermas has shown that there are 12 facts accepted by the vast majority of scholars. He has reduced this to six best attested details in what he calls the "minimal facts" approach. Each of these facts are discussed, but Dr. Licona narrows this down to three facts that nearly all scholars agree upon: 1) Jesus died by crucifixion, 2) the disciples had experiences that led them to believe and proclaim that Jesus had risen from the dead, and 3) Paul converted to Christianity after experiencing what he believed to be a post-Resurrection appearance of Jesus. There's also a lengthy discussion on what "resurrection" meant to Jewish and Christian audiences in the first century. The information contained in this chapter is often completely ignored by agnostics, atheists, Muslims, and others who do not want to even consider the Resurrection as a possibility. I have had many discussions with skeptics who display naivete when they claim that there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus rose from the dead. It's one thing to disbelieve in the event, but it's an entirely different thing to completely ignore or to willingly remain ignorant of the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. The fifth and final chapter of the book examines six different hypotheses that attempt to explain what happened to Jesus after being crucified. Along with the traditional Christian understanding of the Resurrection, the views promoted by Vermes, Goulder, Ludemann, Crossen, and Craffert are weighed in terms of their explanatory scope, explanatory power, plausibility, the amount of ad hoc elements, and illumination for solving problems associated with the subject. An appendix also examines Dale Allison's work on the Resurrection according to the same criteria. The traditional Resurrection hypothesis is the only view that fulfills all five criteria, and it outdistances the other views by a wide margin. Critics can claim that Licona merely concluded what he hoped to prove, but they must be able to point out flaws in his methodology, since his conclusion most certainly follows from the data when historiographical principles are applied. My biggest concern with the book is found in the fifth chapter. While discussing the strange events described in Matthew 27:51-53, Licona suggested that the passage was not describing historical events but employing apocalyptic language to show that a significant person had died. Such descriptions were not uncommon in the ancient world when describing the death of important people. This comment has set off a wave of criticism from conservative Christian scholars like Norman Geisler and Al Mohler. I disagree with Licona's statement and share some of the same concerns as Geisler and Mohler. But when I consider the context and methodology being used in the book, I don't find it to be quite as grievous an error as some have claimed. Skeptics will undoubtedly continue to dismiss the Resurrection of Christ, but they must deal with the research in this book or they simply are not interacting with the latest scholarship. Dr. Licona's work raises the bar when it comes to the most important subject we could ever study: the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in this subject who is up to the task of reading an academic work. I have studied the subject for years, but I still learned a lot and will treasure this book as an extremely valuable resource. Even though I disagree with his take on Matt. 27:51-53, I still need to give the book five stars since I don't need to agree with the author on every point for me to give a positive review and recognize the book's worth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2012
B
Verified Purchase
Brant Jones
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Brilliant, rigorous, balanced, and approachable
Format: Paperback
"The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach," by Michael R. Licona is an outstanding, thorough yet highly approachable assessment of the evidence, sources, and explanatory hypotheses for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As the subtitle suggests, it borrows significant methodological rigor and best practices from the field of historical analysis and applies them to biblical scholarship. Licona begins his assessment with a meticulous discussion of his historical analysis methodology. Included in this section is his definition of five criteria he uses to assess a set of explanatory hypotheses. He then uses those assessments to weigh the hypotheses based on nine levels of certainty ranging from “certainly not historical” to “certainly historical.” The hypothesis representing the best explanation for the resurrection of Christ is the one rated highest in historical certainty based on the five criteria. At the outset of the book, Licona also includes a robust discussion of historical analysis influences and issues because evaluating them openly is essential to his methodical approach and because they aren’t often discussed in biblical studies. It is in this section that he does something quite unique and insightful; Licona includes a full discussion of knowledge, experiences, worldviews, preferences and other influences, which he calls “horizons,” that tend to bias the assessment of history. Furthermore, he defines a set of six methods that he uses throughout the book to avoid his own biases as he strives to present outcomes based on methodical neutrality. It’s quite brilliant. Licona even includes a confession of his own “horizons” - his potential influences. With all this foundation in place, Licona proceeds to identify all sources of evidence for the resurrection of Christ and rates each according to its likelihood of providing reliable independent testimony. Included in this assessment are sources from the Bible, early Christian writers, non-biblical Christian literature and early non-Christian writers. He then uses the most reliable sources as the basis for attesting to the reliability for all the available evidence for the resurrection. This produces three pieces of evidence that he calls “historical bedrock” because they are well attested within multiple reliable sources and are validated by a broad range of scholars. In the final section of the book, Licona evaluates major assertions against the resurrection from skeptics and compares the results against a parallel evaluation of the resurrection hypothesis. Specifically, he uses his criteria and rating system to assess how well hypotheses from a range of skeptical scholars, like Gerd Ludemann and John Dominic Crossan, are able to explain the historical bedrock evidence. At the end of this extensive analysis, the biblical resurrection hypothesis is by far the most credible explanation for historical bedrock evidence associated with the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As noted above, Michael Licona’s book is an excellent assessment of the evidence, sources and competing hypotheses associated with the resurrection of Christ. The author uniquely applies the meticulousness of best practice historical analysis methodology to arguably the most important of all biblical questions. Using rigorous criteria and rating scales, Licona delivers a fair and balanced evaluation that achieves the methodical neutrality he was striving for while minimizing, as best as possible, influences from his “horizons.” It’s also worth noting that Licona assesses a broad range of possible sources, including those classified as gnostic and pseudepigraphal, and includes viewpoints from a broad range of scholars, supportive and skeptical alike. Furthermore, the author includes a very robust set of footnotes on the various topics discussed within the book. These footnotes are helpful for both scholars and non-scholars looking for a deeper understanding or pointers for additional exploration plus they include additional explanatory comments that complement Licona’s focus on delivering a fair and balanced assessment. The one issue I found while reading the book was its treatment of the empty tomb evidence. I was disappointed the author’s discussion was brief since I was looking forward to a robust evaluation. However, in his defense, Licona was looking for historical bedrock evidence that could be used to assess the various resurrection hypotheses. A large number of scholars are skeptical of the empty tomb so it doesn’t belong in his historical bedrock category. Beside this one brief moment of disappointment, I was greatly pleased with the totality of Licona’s analysis and outcomes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2021

recommand products

Bishop's Children Dahlia Seed
22.43
Kid’s Easy Garden Seed Collection – 6 Fast-Growing Vegetables & Herbs for Beginner Gardeners
29.54
Easy Grow Garden Seed Bundle (10 Pack)
25.20
Plastic-Free Pollinator Grow Kits for Bulk Favors (12 Pack) – Buzzy Seeds
23.67
Flower Mix Save the Bees – Michler's Florist, Greenhouses & Garden Design
20.81